Skip to main content

Teacher Education staff at UC employ Mahara as their professional portfolio tool

Late last week I met with four unit conveners from the Teacher Education teaching team, Dr Iain Hay, Dr Misty Kirby, Anita Collins, Dr Steve Shann. Together with Misty Adoniou, Tiina Roppola, and others in Teacher Education they have been integrating ePortfolios into the course wide teacher education curriculum this year. Wanting to deliver the best experience for students who will be asked to use Mahara, and wanting find ways to solve some of their own issues around paper based approaches to the professional development and review process, they decided to use Mahara for their own professional portfolios. 

It was a very informal meeting, Iain, Steve, Anita and Misty individually presented what they had achieved in Mahara by themselves over the last week or so. Each had taken a different approach and created a different looking portfolio based on what they thought the PDR required, what their goals were (e.g. promotion), technical ability etc. This meeting was about coming together to share their experiences, plan a way forward, and access some technical and portfolio practice expertise. Fundamentally, all started with a clear purpose in mind for their portfolio (PDR), and all had so far used paper based evidence gathering and presentation methods for PDR, so the digital portfolio as a method and tool was new.

The rationale for wanting to take a digital portfolio approach in regard to the PDR process was very clearly stated by the group:

Mahara and Performance Development Review Project


  1. Dynamic representation of our professional work (evidence is collected, curated and organised in real time, as opposed to preparing for PDR in the lead up)
  2. Aligning with PEAS (Performance Expectations for Academic Staff)
  3. Ongoing access by the audience of the portfolio (e.g. PDR panel members, mentors, discipline heads, etc)
  4. Improving sustainability in the PDR processes (minimising the amount of printing)
  5. Sharing of portfolios (gaining inspiration from professional peers)
  6. Enriching the discussion around scholarship (through shared portfolios)
  7. Engagement with own practice and that of others, and associated action, as a result of portfolio practice
  8. Future staff creating portfolio when they arrive (useful for their own professional communication and benefits outlined above)


1.     Mechanics of promotion
2.     Mechanics of PDR
3.     Developing/sharing scholarship

Leadership in this project

1.     Redressing the balance between scholarship and output in our professional lives.
2.     Providing the thinking as to our professional needs as academic staff (what we want/need to do), and discovery of how Mahara can help meet these needs.

Other points of interest

During the meeting I described how Mahara can be just part of a larger collection of tools, in a hub kind of way, bringing together various cloud content together in Mahara. My experiences helping others like Felicia Zhang to setup a professional academic portfolio in Mahara showed that Mahara is not (and nor does it claim to be) a tool for all purposes, such as a bibliographic tool, research repository, or presentation tool, etc. For these things other services, like refworks, prezi, etc, are preferable. The great thing about Mahara is that the content from these tools can be brought into a Mahara portfolio.


Popular posts from this blog

What does 2021 hold for student #learningexperience at my university

"Handwriting Text E-Learning Loading. Concept meaning Forecasting the future event"   by  is licensed under  CC BY 2.0 This year we have a unique opportunity to capitalise on what was 2020 and all the impacts it had on learning and teaching.  Staff ICT literacy levels and confidence increased because they had to use digital tools for teaching, there was no choice. This situation was complicated, academics of all levels of ICT literacy had to adapt. Some staff had zero experience with digital tools and were using online tools for the first time, while others are always pushing boundaries and looking for alternative tools available from central support areas. As with staff, some students have very low ICT literacy, while others blaze ahead of the curve, using the tools like pros and needing much instruction. They just work it out. Shifting this cohort of students and staff to fully online was a massive undertaking and a huge shock for everyone.  Going into 2020

Good assessment design is hard, here are some resources that might help

Designing good assessment is an art and a science IMHO. Here are some great resources, as much for my record as they are useful for others. (nice) (multiple pathways to cater for student diversity)

Make your #onlinelearning experience more personal with a #lightboard

In August 2019 the DVCA at UC wanted to invest in some light boards as he had seen the educational benefits at the previous university he worked for. I was tasked with putting in a comprehensive bid to an annual equipment fund and, if successful, follow the process through to implementation working with AV Services, and Library Services. As of March 2020 the Library houses UC's first ever Lighboard, and academic staff are putting it to good use. The Lightboard is a glass panel filled with light which stands between the teacher and the audience/camera. The teacher faces the camera (viewers) and writes on the glass using liquid chalk (for best results), the results glow on the glass, and a camera is used to record the session. The camera we use flips the image horizontally so the writing appears in the correct orientation without having to flip it in a post production process. The videos capture the face and hand movements/gestures of the teacher, as well as the hand written conten