Skip to main content

Adapting the ePortfolio Mini Design Challenge for K-12

Design thinking workshops are a wonderful idea. After seeing what my colleagues, Danny and Matt, were doing I decided to developed one for the MoodlePosium in 2012 for designing ePortfolios (Derived from works by IDEO (2012) and Green & Bonollo (2002), Munnerley and Bacon (2012)). I have used this workshop design twice now here and here, and each time modifications have been required to suit the context. (See an alternative workshop approach here). Time constraints, audience, desired outcomes, etc, all influence the design of each session.

Generally though the key principles of the design challenge are retained. Key principles include:
  • Opportunity provided for ideation around purpose, audience, evidence, ethical considerations
  • Team approach to designing based on a theme (e.g. general purpose)
  • Feedback from others during the process (preferably people with experience)
  • Opportunity to prototype
  • Production of an outcome from the session (something to leave the session with)
This time the workshop is being run for K-12 teachers and principals. Doing this has meant changes to wording have changed the meaning to suit the audience.

This time my colleagues Dr Anita Collins,  Dr Misty Kirby, Dr Iain Hay and Dr Steve Shann, who will be running the workshop with me, have guided the modifications to suit the K-12 audience.

The modifications include:
  • Rather than groups moving to where the panel is, the panel moves between tables providing feedback during the feedback component.
  • Marketing and other terms are replaced with alternatives, such as "pitch your design" -> "communicate your design". 
  • Only one theme is being used due to the homogeneous nature of the audience in this workshop.
  • An hour is being dedicated to hands-on time with Mahara. The panel are also familiar with Mahara and can help people learn this system.
  • Majority felt that blind voting for the best design would not be needed.
Below are the hand-outs of the process. Feel free to explore the other design workshops linked to above.


GREEN, L. & BONOLLO, E. (2002) The Development of a Suite of Design Methods Appropriate for Teaching Product Design”. Global Journal of Eng. Education, Vol.6, No.1, Australia.

IDEO.  (2012).  Design Thinking Toolkit for Educators.  Retrieved from

Munnerley, D. & Bacon, M. (2012) AR Studio Project. Retrieved from


Popular posts from this blog

What does 2021 hold for student #learningexperience at my university

"Handwriting Text E-Learning Loading. Concept meaning Forecasting the future event"   by  is licensed under  CC BY 2.0 This year we have a unique opportunity to capitalise on what was 2020 and all the impacts it had on learning and teaching.  Staff ICT literacy levels and confidence increased because they had to use digital tools for teaching, there was no choice. This situation was complicated, academics of all levels of ICT literacy had to adapt. Some staff had zero experience with digital tools and were using online tools for the first time, while others are always pushing boundaries and looking for alternative tools available from central support areas. As with staff, some students have very low ICT literacy, while others blaze ahead of the curve, using the tools like pros and needing much instruction. They just work it out. Shifting this cohort of students and staff to fully online was a massive undertaking and a huge shock for everyone.  Going into 2020

Good assessment design is hard, here are some resources that might help

Designing good assessment is an art and a science IMHO. Here are some great resources, as much for my record as they are useful for others. (nice) (multiple pathways to cater for student diversity)

Make your #onlinelearning experience more personal with a #lightboard

In August 2019 the DVCA at UC wanted to invest in some light boards as he had seen the educational benefits at the previous university he worked for. I was tasked with putting in a comprehensive bid to an annual equipment fund and, if successful, follow the process through to implementation working with AV Services, and Library Services. As of March 2020 the Library houses UC's first ever Lighboard, and academic staff are putting it to good use. The Lightboard is a glass panel filled with light which stands between the teacher and the audience/camera. The teacher faces the camera (viewers) and writes on the glass using liquid chalk (for best results), the results glow on the glass, and a camera is used to record the session. The camera we use flips the image horizontally so the writing appears in the correct orientation without having to flip it in a post production process. The videos capture the face and hand movements/gestures of the teacher, as well as the hand written conten