Skip to main content

Workshopping the design of a faculty building #refurbishment

At my university a couple of buildings are up for refurbishment. This is a complex task with many stakeholders, stakeholder groups, conflicting needs, limited budgets, etc. The challenge is to deliver a space that works on multiple levels for multiple people. The worst case outcome of this process is a space that is not welcomed by the users and that everyone complains about until the next refurbishment.

When gathering requirements the challenge is to ask the right questions. But what are the right questions? 

The project manager and I began drafting questions and they tended to be functional questions like "what should a work space be", "what is a teaching space" that would have provided answers like "open plan/ individual office space" or "a 20 computer lab/ dry lab/ messy lab". These are questions that may lead to functional answers and do not really help in designing spaces that staff will like to be in, or welcome students, or that foster creativity, etc.

We need to ask different questions to obtain the deeper more meaningful and experiential answers. But what questions do I ask? Funnily enough this was the right question to ask at this stage, and I found the answer in this paper.  Lim, Y., & Odom, W. (n.d.). On the importance of framing questions for user research in the experience-centered design process. Retrieved June 23, 2015, from

After reading this I designed a short 1.5 hour workshop aimed at gathering the kind of information the project manager and architects could use as a foundation for designing a space people could really relate to and like to be in. Because they seek personal meaning some of the questions are possibly confronting, and I wasn't sure if this would work at all, but it did, and the feedback from the project manager indicated he would have me back again for the next project.

Using the following worksheet I employed a very simple Design Thinking Workshop approach described below.

The approach used:
1) Provide context, why are we here? (preferably from a Head of Faculty/Business Owner)
2) Describe the process we are about to go through.
3) Everyone spends 30 minutes providing responses. Advise to only write down what people are comfortable writing down - some views can also be conveyed to the project team or others out of session if desired, or not at all.
4) Going around the table everyone gets to present their views (the facilitator must ensure this happens).
5) Themes: During the presentations some discussion will happen but try to keep it moving - in the mean time someone writes down emerging themes.
6) The captured themes are presented and everyone has the option to add missed themes.
7) The resulting documentation (completed worksheets) and the themes are collected and later disseminated to the participants and other relevant stakeholders such as faculty heads and architects.

Hope this helps someone, give it a go!


Popular posts from this blog

What does 2021 hold for student #learningexperience at my university

"Handwriting Text E-Learning Loading. Concept meaning Forecasting the future event"   by  is licensed under  CC BY 2.0 This year we have a unique opportunity to capitalise on what was 2020 and all the impacts it had on learning and teaching.  Staff ICT literacy levels and confidence increased because they had to use digital tools for teaching, there was no choice. This situation was complicated, academics of all levels of ICT literacy had to adapt. Some staff had zero experience with digital tools and were using online tools for the first time, while others are always pushing boundaries and looking for alternative tools available from central support areas. As with staff, some students have very low ICT literacy, while others blaze ahead of the curve, using the tools like pros and needing much instruction. They just work it out. Shifting this cohort of students and staff to fully online was a massive undertaking and a huge shock for everyone.  Going into 2020

University of Canberra Library adds #VR Headsets to the catalogue - on the road to immersive learning resources in #Education

In September 2018 the UC Library added VR headsets to the catalogue, available in the short loan section. Students can loan the headsets for up to 3 hours. Support for using the headsets will be limited to basic guidance, and beyond this it will be up to students to have their apps and content ready, just needing the headset to get going. Supporting this technology is difficult given the number of different phones, OS versions and apps out there giving rise to any app recommendations working on one phone and not another. For this reason support will be limited, however as our in-house knowledge grows more advice will be able to be given. A small number of headsets to start with represents a low risk investment that also allows staff to up skill in VR technology. Demo sessions and training given to Library staff has been fun and a valuable sharing activity as everyone is at different stages of familiarity. Now that a number of staff in the library have been up skilled we can begin t

Make your #onlinelearning experience more personal with a #lightboard

In August 2019 the DVCA at UC wanted to invest in some light boards as he had seen the educational benefits at the previous university he worked for. I was tasked with putting in a comprehensive bid to an annual equipment fund and, if successful, follow the process through to implementation working with AV Services, and Library Services. As of March 2020 the Library houses UC's first ever Lighboard, and academic staff are putting it to good use. The Lightboard is a glass panel filled with light which stands between the teacher and the audience/camera. The teacher faces the camera (viewers) and writes on the glass using liquid chalk (for best results), the results glow on the glass, and a camera is used to record the session. The camera we use flips the image horizontally so the writing appears in the correct orientation without having to flip it in a post production process. The videos capture the face and hand movements/gestures of the teacher, as well as the hand written conten